Deterministic governance
Policy gate
The one place in the fabric where a decision becomes binding. Scores enter as inputs; the outcome is a conjunction of booleans that a supervisor can re-derive line by line.
Operating principle
Order is the control
Evaluate a transaction
Pick a principal and an amount
Per-transaction velocity cap ₹2,00,000
Composite trust
88%
Decision
PERMIT
Evaluation trace
Permit = Identity ∧ Authority ∧ Consent ∧ Policy ∧ RiskWithinLimit
Identity valid
identity assurance 98% ≥ 90% floor
Authority valid
delegated authority 88% within mandate
Consent valid
active purpose-bound consent 96%
Policy valid
compliance 94%, cyber risk 9%
Risk within limit
fraud 8% ≤ 30%, trust 88% ≥ 60%
VelocityWithinLimit
₹1,80,000 against a ₹2,00,000 per-transaction cap
{
"principal": "USR-10024",
"amount_inr": 180000,
"clauses": {
"IdentityValid": true,
"AuthorityValid": true,
"ConsentValid": true,
"PolicyValid": true,
"RiskWithinLimit": true,
"velocity": true
},
"decision": "PERMIT",
"advisory_inputs": {
"composite_trust": 0.882,
"fraud": 0.08
},
"override_possible_by_model": false,
"trace_signature": "ML-DSA-65"
}Hard constraints
Never weighted, never optimised, never overridden
AI and quantum layers can only tighten an outcome or propose a cheaper evidence path inside the permitted region. They cannot widen it.
Regulator-facing explanation
Control family, audit record and reporting posture
The deterministic layers above run without AI. Generate a narrative to add a plain-language explanation of the current state for reviewers and supervisors.